Latest post Wed, Oct 10 2007 8:34 PM by Dom Q. Silverio. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next

  • Wed, Oct 10 2007 8:28 PM

    • symphonycc
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • NYC
    • Posts 56
    • Points 690

    DNxHD 36 is great..BUT!!!

    Reply Contact
    Will it be working in other formats then just 1080p/23.98.

    Whycome not 720p/59.94  or 1080i/59.94 ???

    Evan

    [view my complete system specs]
    ---- Evan Anthony Frame:Runner, NYC 212-246-4224 "No matter where you go, There you are."

  • Wed, Oct 10 2007 8:34 PM In reply to

    Re: DNxHD 36 is great..BUT!!!

    Reply Contact
    The format was created for the film-offline-HD crowd, thus the limited 1080p support.

    I do hope Avid comes out with a low res version of DNxHD for offline use. I understand the reasoning that SD codecs often suffice or that DNxHD is low enough for todays multi terrabyte world. However, a low res DNxHD would help a lot since it means you can edit in the same format as your online and don't need terrabytes of storage for your Adrenaline offline.

    MC 2022, W11, ASUS z690m, Intel 13900K, MSI 4090 Suprim Liquid, 128GB RAM, Samsung 980 Pro M2 SSD, BM Mini monitor & Dell UP2718Q. MBP 2019, Big Sur... [view my complete system specs]

    DQS

    www.mpenyc.com
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)

© Copyright 2011 Avid Technology, Inc.  Terms of Use |  Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Find a Reseller