<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.avid.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Avid Symphony </title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/56.aspx</link><description>Forum for both Symphony Nitris and Symphony products</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31106.96)</generator><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/410591.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:25:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:410591</guid><dc:creator>Sycophant</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/410591.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=410591</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I listed all&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;HD acquisition formats and modes - there were more than 70 by my count. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dylanreeve.com/videotv/2009/video-salad.html"&gt;http://dylanreeve.com/videotv/2009/video-salad.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At least all HD is upperfield, and the full raster sizes are fairly straight forward. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In PAL we have two neat DV issues - one is that all DV is Lower-field, where PAL 601 is Upper-field. The other is that all PAL DV is 4:2:0 except DVCPRO which is 4:1:1... So much pain. At least we only have one SD framesize.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/410568.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:25:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:410568</guid><dc:creator>Bill Nelson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/410568.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=410568</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;well then, what about thin raster?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55355.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:56:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:55355</guid><dc:creator>TCurren</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55355.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=55355</wfw:commentRss><description>That's what I mean. How about just a few "standards". Can't we all just get along. ;-)</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55329.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:50:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:55329</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55329.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=55329</wfw:commentRss><description>Could be worse. In 625-line, DV has the opposite field ordering from 601. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-greg&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55199.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:16:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:55199</guid><dc:creator>TCurren</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/55199.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=55199</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks Greg. More numbers, my head's going to explode.</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/54989.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:54989</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/54989.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=54989</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks, Terry. Sorry for the delay folks. I've been snowed under, as it were.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1080i interlace is always Upper Field, or Odd, ordered. That applies to all frame rates. Note that this is opposite from 525-line (NTSC) which is Lower Field, or Even, ordered. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-greg&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/53338.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:03:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:53338</guid><dc:creator>TCurren</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/53338.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=53338</wfw:commentRss><description>Greg Staten seems to be watching this list, any answers for us?</description></item><item><title>Re: HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/53040.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:40:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:53040</guid><dc:creator>FutureX</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/53040.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=53040</wfw:commentRss><description>HDV is upper field first.  Not sure if that applies to all HD codecs though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>HD Field Dominance</title><link>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/52840.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">33dbc7b4-0359-4be4-a659-9f674152ccc7:52840</guid><dc:creator>Vagn Steen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.avid.com/forums/thread/52840.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.avid.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=56&amp;PostID=52840</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a standard field dominance for 1080i 29.97 footage?&amp;nbsp; I am editing on a Adrenaline HD and on a Symphonty Nitris. In the past I &amp;nbsp;have edited and exported NTSC material using lower field. Is this correct or should I be using upper field, specifically for QT export to a graphic workstation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Vagn Steen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>