Latest post Fri, Aug 1 2008 4:43 PM by tonyjover. 9 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Sun, Jul 27 2008 12:54 AM

    • tommy_12
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Posts 14
    • Points 220

    Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    Hello there,

    im tommy and i'm a video editor.

    Can someone tell me, what exactly is DS ?

    what is different from AE ? 

    and why should i prefer DS on other software ?

    thanks..

  • Sun, Jul 27 2008 3:13 AM In reply to

    • avidmedic
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Mon, Jan 30 2006
    • Atlanta, ga
    • Posts 51
    • Points 555

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    Hello, DS is a product Avid acquired when they bought Softimage.  DS or Digital Studio, is Avid's high end compositing workstation.  I would consider it a hybrid editor.  It is a superb compositor, a strong video editor and a powerful audio editor.  

    The power of the DS comes from it's hardware.  While it does use the machine's capabilities, the hardware allows for a large range of function.  From working with Uncompressed HD easily, or more complex 2k high res workflows, DS is an amazing product.  I would say it is the most understated product in the Avid line.  

    I would describe the DS interface as a cross between After effects, final cut pro and Avid.  It really works well and fast.  It is faster to render than after effects, and if you are doing effects heavy work, it is the product you should be looking at.

    Truely an amazing product.

     

     

    You name it, I've seen it. [view my complete system specs]

  • Sun, Jul 27 2008 7:36 PM In reply to

    • mrmikster
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Los Angeleez
    • Posts 268
    • Points 2,930
    • Moderator: Avid DS

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    Everything AvidMedic wrote above:

    Plus, the conform from Avid offline systems/Symphony is quite good. In my experience about 85% of the timeline is there. Lately we've been doing quite a bit of 2K fluidmotion. The film editors love it and it can't be done easily on any other system out there.

    You don't have to jump back and forth between different software. No worries about gamma shifts, missing alpha channels, field order or the many issues when using multiple apps. Also there is the huge time savings in working with a single interface, and less metadata management headaches.

    If you would like to give it a spin, here is the link to the DS Assist software: http://www.avid.com/products/tryout.html

    Look for the link to DS Assist.

     

    There is also a DS Training software here: http://www3.softimage.com/

    Along the top, look for the download button, then along the left, look for the DS Training Software link.  Here: http://www3.softimage.com/avidds/default.asp?url=/DS/default.asp

    you can find some old tutorial material to play with. Some new tutorials are being worked on and should be posted soon.

     

    Michael

     

    "There are no rules for the brave". Albert Einstein

  • Mon, Jul 28 2008 12:10 AM In reply to

    • tommy_12
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Posts 14
    • Points 220

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

     thanks  a lot

    i did actualy download the DS Assist software.

    and it seem to be a monstersoft, but the interface a little bit confusing

    and it is not simple, but very very interesting.

    now i know more about  this software and this can help me.

    thanks a lot

    tommy

  • Mon, Jul 28 2008 12:59 AM In reply to

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    "... Plus, the conform from Avid offline systems/Symphony is quite good. In my experience about 85% of the timeline is there. ..."

    Mike,

    Is there any rhyme or resaon for the missing 15%? I'm wondering if there are things we working in MC or Xpress Pro should avoid to make that 15% even  lower.  Thanks much as always.

    P4 3.0. 2 Gig RAM, CAS 2.5. Intel 865PERL mobo. Two WD 7,200 IDE drives and two WD Raptor 10,000 SATA drives--no RAID. nVIDIA Quadro FX 1100. Two EIZO... [view my complete system specs]

     

  • Mon, Jul 28 2008 2:34 AM In reply to

    • jef
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on Sun, Feb 26 2006
    • Maryland
    • Posts 281
    • Points 3,430

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    On the DS site

    www3.softimage.com

    dig around under Documentation / v7.5 and you will find the Conform Guide.

    In here is a grading system of all effects in a MC and how well it comes across.

    Jef

    Mac Dual 2.8 8core ATI2600 OS 10.4.11 /10.5.5 10 GB ram 2xSATA software raid local storage PC - Dell 360 3GHz XPPro 2.5 GB ram, local SATA storage [view my complete system specs]
  • Mon, Jul 28 2008 3:50 AM In reply to

    • mrmikster
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Los Angeleez
    • Posts 268
    • Points 2,930
    • Moderator: Avid DS

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    http://www3.softimage.com/ds2/right/document/v7.6/guides/ConformGuide.pdf

     

    http://www3.softimage.com/ds2/right/document/v8.4/guides/DS_UserGuide.pdf or you can find info in here.

     

    Of course with every release it keeps getting better.

     

    Michael

    "There are no rules for the brave". Albert Einstein

  • Thu, Jul 31 2008 10:38 AM In reply to

    • tonyjover
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Birmingham UK
    • Posts 76
    • Points 745

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    BobbyMurcerFan:
    things we working in MC or Xpress Pro should avoid
     

    Hi Bobby,

    Right now any AvidFX, umm.. effects.

    Three reasons:
    1. They're AVX2 effects and DS doesn't currently support AVX2. 
    2. Even when DS does support AVX2 Boris will have to re-write them to work in 64 bit before DS can use them
    3. (The contensious one) Effects are generally better done in Online with better image quality, a wider range of effects at their disposal, and an Online Editor's eye to match them in with the rest of the programme.

    Regards,
    Tone :)

    DS v10 x 2, MC (various), DS beta tester [view my complete system specs]

     

  • Fri, Aug 1 2008 12:14 PM In reply to

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    After reading the "Conform Guide" and this thread, I'm left with the impression that while conform with DS is good, it's not where Symphony's is.

    Which makes me think more about capturing in MC and then going over to the Assist Station sooner rather than later, if the plan is to finish with DS.

    P4 3.0. 2 Gig RAM, CAS 2.5. Intel 865PERL mobo. Two WD 7,200 IDE drives and two WD Raptor 10,000 SATA drives--no RAID. nVIDIA Quadro FX 1100. Two EIZO... [view my complete system specs]

     

  • Fri, Aug 1 2008 4:43 PM In reply to

    • tonyjover
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Birmingham UK
    • Posts 76
    • Points 745

    Re: Does DS better than AE, or it a bit different ?

    BobbyMurcerFan:
    going over to the Assist Station sooner rather than later,
     

    You're not wrong, Bobby.

    MC is a great editor, so use it to edit.  DS is a great finisher, so use it to finish.

    Ingest on MC, edit on MC, then when the edit is more or less complete and you want to look at FX, Titling, Compositing, Graphics etc, move over to DS.

    Regards,
    Tone :)

    DS v10 x 2, MC (various), DS beta tester [view my complete system specs]

     

Page 1 of 1 (10 items)