camoscato:

VGUK2:

Were you at the same demo AndrewAction?  You seem very sure of yourself so I guess you were.

Hi,

You've recently been warned about making posts personal.  Play nice.

good luck,
Carl

What the ..?

Andrew I was sleeping during the first half of the demo when 

he was talking about apple and FCP.

But when they started talking about Aftereffects, outputting to tape

without an NLE, viewing shake, and DVDSP, that was impressive for

the dollar.

As for as NLE goes I'm sticking to Avid, MC v3 looks great, but nobody

is giving me an answer on the subtitle part of the software.

I'd like some answers on exporting STL files.

thanks

Mike 

Randy et al....

Hows this ???

http://www.avid.com/products/professionalfilm.asp

Will make it easier to access in the navigation bars for all products shortly.

Not always on the forums each minute of the day so you can always email me to with requests like this :)

Marianna

VGUK2:

 Were you at the same demo AndrewAction?

Marianna,

Wow, this is great.  Was that matrix always there and we didn't know where to look?? Or is it new?

A good matrix!

Need to be geekified more to satisfy the technophiles in this forum (thin raster, bit depth, pulldown, etc).

MIkeFilm:

but nobody

is giving me an answer on the subtitle part of the software.

Guys....What do we think about this....

What more, specifically does Avid need to spell out in this type of marketing info (Make sure you follow the "Learn More" link too)

Mark this time and date. And forum section...

Blkdog is late on something

:D

scroll up

MIkeFilm:

As for as NLE goes I'm sticking to Avid, MC v3 looks great, but nobody

is giving me an answer on the subtitle part of the software.

I'd like some answers on exporting STL files.

thanks

Subcap

(at the end of the video)

Go and be happy

And you owe me a glass of root beer.

Dom Q. Silverio:

Subcap

Dom is late on something

scroll up

Andrew,

I was going to say touche!

but I think you either miss my edit (link) or I am too stupid to get it.

Yeah, Marianna and I were talking  about it and I got tied up with clients (stupid money-givers).

So, we still haven't heard where this doc falls short.

I know you guys can find something.

I agree that it needs to be more geekafied.  When I look at the product matrix, these are the questions I ask myself.  Some of these are just textual perhaps, and if I go to the product pagse I might be able to answer some of them:

- The group "SD I/O and monitoring"... what is "monitoring"? I assume analog output? But it's not checked for NitrisDX, and that has analog... so i dunno.

- If groups such as "Advanced VFX finishing toolset" were hot-linked to exactly what that is, that would help a ton.  Otherwise its just marketing.


- I like the group for DNxHD capture... it's very clear (not specific, but clear) what I would need if I want to capture directly to that codec.

- "Export to web or mobile" and "Burn to DVD and Blu-ray" I assume this is with Sorenson and Avid DVD.  Perhaps a note.

- Can prices be added?

- Side note, would love love love more product shots.  I want to see every angle, every input, every switch and toggle so I can geek out about it.

- This is a big one, and I don't even really expect it, but it's the competitive advantage matrix.  The price-point for Avid products is so drastically different from "competing products", I personally still don't know why it costs so much.

 There are great conversations happening about factors that contribute to that price (customer support, etc.) but it's still not clicking with me.  Either it's not communicated or I'm just not hearing it, or simply a product like the MojoDX or NitrisDX at that price is just not for me (even though I want one ;)

It's almost as if I want to say "I need feature-X, what in the Avid product line gives me that? OK, now how does that Avid product that has feature-X compare to other companies products that give me Feature-X and why is Avid's better?" And that's where I would like it to get technical.

does that make sense?

Dom Q. Silverio:

I think you either miss my edit (link)