Latest post Wed, Apr 9 2008 10:12 PM by rfayan. 25 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (26 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Mon, Apr 7 2008 1:18 PM In reply to

    • sep
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • France
    • Posts 5,593
    • Points 62,580

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    greendog:

    ... how about also getting them to include Rotation into the effect.  Big Smile

     

    ...like "Miving Picture"

    Adrenaline MCA 2.8 XW8400 3Gb RAM DNxcel Board, 760 Gb striped SCSI media storage, 1.2 TB 4 X striped SAS 15 000rpm storage.----MC Soft 2.8 + Mojo HP XW8000... [view my complete system specs]

    sep

     

    "out of difficulty comes performance"

    ______________________________

     

     Web site : www.audiacom.com

  • Mon, Apr 7 2008 4:28 PM In reply to

    • greendog
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Posts 69
    • Points 855

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    sep:

    greendog:

    ... how about also getting them to include Rotation into the effect.  Big Smile

     

    ...like "Miving Picture"

     

    Exactly.. something Avid should have bought YEARS ago and incorporated into the software.

  • Mon, Apr 7 2008 4:38 PM In reply to

    • BLKDOG
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Lansing, MI
    • Posts 15,837
    • Points 201,255
    • Avid Employee

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    Trust me, No one in Tewks need me to suggest this. It's been a feature request for years.

    Project Manager, Avid Professional Services - Americas [view my complete system specs]

    "We do not wash our pits in the sacred pool of tears..." - Master Shifu

    FCP2Avid

  • Mon, Apr 7 2008 4:46 PM In reply to

    • greendog
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Posts 69
    • Points 855

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

     I know.  It was really more of a joke than a Feature Request.  As shown by  the Big Smiley at the end.

  • Mon, Apr 7 2008 10:19 PM In reply to

    • sep
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • France
    • Posts 5,593
    • Points 62,580

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    BLKDOG:

    Trust me, No one in Tewks need me to suggest this. It's been a feature request for years.

     

    Does this mean they are deaf ?Smile  No, joking aside, I agree that rotation is very useful for P&Z, anyway, I use it sometimes with Moving Picture, but can create unwanted artefacts, depending on the strill you apply it on.

    Adrenaline MCA 2.8 XW8400 3Gb RAM DNxcel Board, 760 Gb striped SCSI media storage, 1.2 TB 4 X striped SAS 15 000rpm storage.----MC Soft 2.8 + Mojo HP XW8000... [view my complete system specs]

    sep

     

    "out of difficulty comes performance"

    ______________________________

     

     Web site : www.audiacom.com

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 4:32 PM In reply to

    • rfayan
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, May 5 2006
    • Posts 15
    • Points 190
    • Avid Employee

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    Hi guys, this is Randy from Avid engineering.  The change in behavior you're describing was done to fix memory problems.  Previously, we cached the P&Z images at their full resolution for real-time playback.  This caused all sorts of nasty out-of-memory conditions, because images were often much larger than video images.  Now we cache the images at "video resolution" for real-time playback (regardless of your cache settings), as well as providing more intelligent automatic cache behavior.  This has fixed numerous complaints we had with the system running of out memory.  Be assured, though, that the actual render of the effect will produce the result with the full image resolution, and with the filter quality selected.

    I hope this clarifies the situation,

    -Randy


     

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 4:45 PM In reply to

    • greendog
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • Posts 69
    • Points 855

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    rfayan:

    Hi guys, this is Randy from Avid engineering.  The change in behavior you're describing was done to fix memory problems.  Previously, we cached the P&Z images at their full resolution for real-time playback.  This caused all sorts of nasty out-of-memory conditions, because images were often much larger than video images.  Now we cache the images at "video resolution" for real-time playback (regardless of your cache settings), as well as providing more intelligent automatic cache behavior.  This has fixed numerous complaints we had with the system running of out memory.  Be assured, though, that the actual render of the effect will produce the result with the full image resolution, and with the filter quality selected.

    I hope this clarifies the situation,

    -Randy

     

    Thanks very much for the clarification.  But I can't resist now that Avid has chimed in.... how about rotation?  Big Smile

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 5:07 PM In reply to

    • rfayan
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, May 5 2006
    • Posts 15
    • Points 190
    • Avid Employee

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    I hear you loud and clear.  I can't promise anything, but I will be sure to take this to the Product Management team, who is responsible for prioritizing all of the editor work to be done.

    -Randy


     

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 6:28 PM In reply to

    • sep
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on Thu, Oct 13 2005
    • France
    • Posts 5,593
    • Points 62,580

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

     That's interesting !

    Adrenaline MCA 2.8 XW8400 3Gb RAM DNxcel Board, 760 Gb striped SCSI media storage, 1.2 TB 4 X striped SAS 15 000rpm storage.----MC Soft 2.8 + Mojo HP XW8000... [view my complete system specs]

    sep

     

    "out of difficulty comes performance"

    ______________________________

     

     Web site : www.audiacom.com

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 7:17 PM In reply to

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    rfayan:
    Be assured, though, that the actual render of the effect will produce the result with the full image resolution, and with the filter quality selected.
    This was understood by the original poster but they, and I, at times NEED to see the full resolution when creating complex moves on small detailed imagess like maps. Hence the suggestion to have the old (buggy) version (called something different if need be) included again to compliment the new improved P&Z.

    Thanks for the continued dongle support

  • Wed, Apr 9 2008 10:12 PM In reply to

    • rfayan
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on Fri, May 5 2006
    • Posts 15
    • Points 190
    • Avid Employee

    Re: Problem with Pan and Zoom and 2.8

    Ah, I see what you're after now.  Perhaps we could cache the image at a higher res in effects mode. I'd have to research this to see if this is possible. 

    Thanks for the feedback,

    -Randy


     

Page 2 of 2 (26 items) < Previous 1 2